Return to the ASTR120 main page
MESSAGE #54. Thu Dec 20 0:38:34 2007 . William Updegraff wrote:
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Murphy's_law_application_for_antigravitatory_cats
MESSAGE #53. Sat Dec 15 18:34:23 2007 . Lauren Woolsey wrote:
To Prof. Hamilton: When will the exams be graded? I hate this waiting around not knowing, haha. All my friends are getting their math exam grades back and such, and I don't have as much patience as I ought to have. Oh well.
MESSAGE #52. Sun Dec 9 13:37:05 2007 . William Updegraff wrote:
MESSAGE #51. Fri Dec 7 13:59:35 2007 . Prof. Doug Hamilton wrote:
MESSAGE #50. Fri Dec 7 13:54:33 2007 . Prof. Doug Hamilton wrote:
Some quick announcements!
1. Since the Dec. 5 Open House was cancelled, there is a make-up assignment due Tuesday 12/11, the last day of class. The make up assignment is to go to the Air and Space Museum downtown, pick out an historic spaceprobe and write a 2-3 page paper about its history, discoveries, and importance. If possible, pick a spaceprobe with a scientific mission rather than a manned spacecraft. You can use additional sources, but have the Air and Space Museum be your primary source. I am expecting about 10 of these papers based on a show of hands yesterday. The deadline has to be firm, since the final exam is only 2-days later. Please don't skip the assignment - its worth 40 points!
2. The Final Exam (200pts) is cumulative, with a slight emphasis on new material that has not been tested before. We'll talk more about this on Tuesday. Mia will run a review session Wednesday from 6-8 in our classroom. Don't forget to study for the final in the excitement of the end of the semester!
3. Course Evaluations are online and linked from the ASTR120 page. Please fill these out! The campus, in its wisdom, equates lack of response with a poorly-taught class. I'll see your comments (anonymously), so please note things that you think I can do to make ASTR121 an even better class than ASTR120!
MESSAGE #49. Wed Dec 5 18:16:38 2007 . Prof. Doug Hamilton wrote:
MESSAGE #48. Fri Nov 16 11:35:08 2007 . Lauren Woolsey wrote:
Oh, and while I'm talking about hubblesite... This game is so much fun, and you learn a lot you didn't know. I'd suggest putting your computer on mute, the sounds can get annoying after a short while.
MESSAGE #47. Thu Nov 8 20:53:44 2007 . Nathaniel Niles wrote:
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071107_kaguya_movie_e.html
MESSAGE #46. Wed Oct 31 15:53:50 2007 . Kristin Rutkowski wrote:
I'm going to try to go tonight around 8 or 9, if anyone would like a ride. (krutkows at umd.edu)
MESSAGE #45. Wed Oct 31 10:36:27 2007 . Lauren Woolsey wrote:
After sunset, there should be a pretty bright star in the east. This star is Capella (if you wanted to use Starry Night or Stellarium to find it, that would work well). Near the zenith is a W-shaped constellation, Cassiopoeia. If you go upwards in the sky from Capella towards Cassiopoeia, there will be a small isoceles/equilateral triangle. The lower left point is the comet. (.'.)
If anyone wants to come by Denton, I have high-quality binoculars that show the spherical shell of the asteroid. It's one of the coolest things I've seen in the night sky.
MESSAGE #44. Tue Oct 30 14:23:44 2007 . Prof. Doug Hamilton wrote:
MESSAGE #43. Fri Oct 26 13:45:57 2007 . Prof. Doug Hamilton wrote:
Elizabeth2 - Nice Jupiter Pics!
Adam - I approve of your reading list!
And I wanted to let you all know that there is a new Challenge Problem on the assignments page. Several of you have expressed interest in forming study sessions for the homework. Post a message here to form one for HW#7!
MESSAGE #42. Tue Oct 16 22:06:02 2007 . Elizabeth Tuley wrote:
This is the best article that I could find online explaining what will happen December 21, 2012: http://www.astro.uu.nl/~strous/AA/en/2012.html
Basically, the Mayans produced a calandar which revolved around a period of time which they calculated based on the cycles of the solar year, the synodic year of venus, and the human natal period (i.e. 9 months) and was socially significant to them. They predicted the end of the Earth (or rather, the fourth Earth age according to their mythology) to fall on December 21, 2012 based on these cycles and the fact that December 21 is also a winter solstice. However, it is believed by scientists the locations of the planets in the night sky are coincidental.
If you're interested in this topic, I would suggest taking Ancient Astronomies by Prof Carlson. It's offered every Spring by the Honors Department, and it's a very interesting class!
MESSAGE #41. Tue Oct 16 15:06:30 2007 . Elizabeth Terry wrote:
I finally got the final product of the research i did over the summer. This image was made from 7 different images taken during one rotation of Jupiter in October 1996 from Hubble's many color filters. It's not real color obviously but the best approximation NASA can do at the moment, without seeing it with our own eyes. [This version is scaled down because the original image is about 36 inches wide.]
So here you go! [URL=http://www.picoodle.com/view.php?img=/6/10/16/f_Oct1996colom_3772c52.png&srv=img27][IMG]http://img27.picoodle.com/img/img27/6/10/16/f_Oct1996colom_3772c52.png[/IMG][/URL]
MESSAGE #40. Fri Oct 12 6:56:06 2007 . Adam Dowd wrote:
I was reading one of the science mags I subscribe to when I stumbled upon this article featuring our professor as a quoted expert.
Here is the link:
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/10/11/moon_spa.html?category=space&guid=20071011140000&dcitc=w19-502-ak-0000
The article is pretty interesting. It describes the resonant effects of the gravitational fields of Jupiter and Venus have upon our moon. Appartently, over time these small gravitaional perturbations cause the lunar orbit to increase in eccentricity.
I just think it is cool to see that what we are learning in class is actually being discussed in professional astronomy, by our, um... professor, no less!
MESSAGE #39. Wed Oct 10 13:36:17 2007 . TA Mia Bovill wrote:
Today (Wednesday) 6-8 pm in CSS 2428 (usual room).
Questions on Chapters 1-4,7,8 and Homeworks 1-5 are fair game.
MESSAGE #38. Sat Oct 6 11:14:59 2007 . Jesus Careaga wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20071005/sc_space/seeacelestialsummitmeeting
MESSAGE #37. Wed Oct 3 17:55:27 2007 . TA Mia Bovill wrote:
On Problem 32 (Chapter 7), Part b, you can ignore them motion of the Earth. Just assume that you are standing on the surface of the Sun with really good heat protection :).
MESSAGE #36. Tue Oct 2 20:15:01 2007 . Jaime Gomez wrote:
Jaime
MESSAGE #35. Tue Oct 2 11:39:55 2007 . Ian Mitchell wrote:
http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/press-rel/pr-2002/video/vid-02-02.mpg
MESSAGE #34. Mon Oct 1 16:27:32 2007 . Anthony Burnetti wrote:
Anyone else read Contact, by Carl Sagan? Awesome novel about the detection of a radio message from an alien civilization.
MESSAGE #33. Mon Oct 1 16:24:07 2007 . Anthony Burnetti wrote:
I was remembering how we briefly touched on astrology and how it doesn't work (or have any mechanism by which it COULD work). Theres a video series on youtube called "bogosity" where this guy takes ideas like astrology, the moon "hoax", etc. and debunks it. He does a good job with astrology, although towards the end he gets more into criticizing more people on youtube who post things saying that astrology is true. Its divided into parts - he first two parts are at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rDRpyLkces and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XRri1nbqco . The 3rd is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnCgT5uDHiI but here he is more ranting at people on youtube who don't like him.
MESSAGE #32. Sun Sep 30 19:57:42 2007 . Lauren Woolsey wrote:
MESSAGE #31. Sun Sep 30 0:33:55 2007 . Eran Bar Noy wrote:
MESSAGE #30. Fri Sep 28 7:44:56 2007 . Kristin Rutkowski wrote:
MESSAGE #29. Thu Sep 27 18:07:45 2007 . Elizabeth Terry wrote:
-Eliz
MESSAGE #28. Wed Sep 26 22:02:31 2007 . Kristin Rutkowski wrote:
MESSAGE #27. Wed Sep 26 21:00:46 2007 . Alejandra Ferrufino wrote:
MESSAGE #26. Wed Sep 26 19:58:04 2007 . Kristin Rutkowski wrote:
I read this space.com article about the harvest moon, and it says that the reason the differences in moon rise times aren't as different night to night is because the moon seems to move along the ecliptic, and right now the ecliptic is as close as possible to the horizon. I'm having a hard time picturing that, though. I can picture the Sun in the middle, and the Earth orbiting around the ecliptic, and the Earth tilted 23 degrees, and the Moon orbiting the Earth, and mostly picture the Moon's 5 degree tilt. But I still get a little thrown trying to picture how everything revolves together, and how it all relates to what I see in the sky (although Starry Night really helps there). Has anyone come across a good 3-d video of how the orbits and ecliptic all match up? Or good physical models? Kind of like Prof Hamilton's model of the celestial sphere (although I like having the Sun in the middle rather than the Earth).
Kristin
MESSAGE #25. Tue Sep 25 16:14:08 2007 . Valerie Klavans wrote:
I found a cool interactive site on the Drake equation. Basically the Drake equation calculates a possible number of communicating civilizations in the Milky Way, based on 7 factors, starting with the number of stars in the Milky Way galaxy, and ending with the fraction of the planet's life during which the communicating civilizations live. The first part of the page explains each variable in the equation and how the Drake equation works. The second half lets you input numbers for the variables and calculate a possible number of communicating civilizations in the Milky Way. Yay!
Here is the link: http://www.activemind.com/Mysterious/Topics/SETI/drake_equation.html
MESSAGE #24. Tue Sep 25 13:45:42 2007 . Muiz Amusat wrote:
MESSAGE #23. Sun Sep 23 16:24:55 2007 . Wesley Szamotula wrote:
http://www.linkydinky.com/images/CelestialBodies.jpg
MESSAGE #22. Fri Sep 21 19:07:32 2007 . Prof. Doug Hamilton wrote:
Sorry for those of you who were turned away at the Open House last night - the observatory was overwhelmed with ASTR100 students! We are working to make sure that this does not happen again ...
DH
MESSAGE #21. Wed Sep 19 0:18:16 2007 . Benjamin Crist wrote:
MESSAGE #20. Tue Sep 18 13:29:27 2007 . Prof. Doug Hamilton wrote:
Hi Class!
Hopefully this email will go through this time ...
A quick reminder on assignment policy since Mia and I have been overwhelmed with too many special cases! Part of this is because this class is oversubscriped with 54 students (should be limited to 40!). To make things managable, if you will miss class or section, you *must*
i) Notify us *both* by email *before* the missed class ii) This does *not* automatically excuse you from homework deadlines (especially if you know about the absence ahead of time as with a holiday). iii) Homeworks are due Thursday at the beginning of class. If you miss a class, arrange to have a friend turn it in. In special cases, Mia will accept the homework on Friday *before* section for a late penalty. Homeworks will not be accepted after section Friday. iv) Make up work for section (with an excused absence) *must* be completed by 2pm the following Friday. It is up to you to make arrangements with Mia.
Please try to follow these guidelines to make everything flow smoothly!
Thanks! Doug Hamilton
MESSAGE #19. Thu Sep 13 0:14:50 2007 . Lauren Woolsey wrote:
MESSAGE #18. Wed Sep 12 17:51:10 2007 . Elizabeth Tuley wrote:
Also, there will be movie night, September 27. We'll be watching Men In Black, so everyone should come join us!!
MESSAGE #17. Tue Sep 11 23:24:56 2007 . Lauren Woolsey wrote:
MESSAGE #16. Sun Sep 9 16:10:18 2007 . Ian Mitchell wrote:
MESSAGE #15. Wed Sep 5 17:51:55 2007 . Alicia Jose wrote:
MESSAGE #14. Tue Sep 4 18:39:27 2007 . Elizabeth Terry wrote:
I did research on Jupiter at NASA Goddard over the summer and came out with some pretty amazing stuff. Unfortunately i can't put any of the stuff i worked on on the web because it hasn't been released by the government yet, but there is this cool movie of Jupiter's atmosphere (taken by the Voyager missions) i found when i worked at Brown university. Enjoy!! [hopefully it works]
http://s237.photobucket.com/albums/ff211/jupiterfreak/?action=view¤t=JupiterAtmosphere.flv
MESSAGE #13. Tue Sep 4 16:30:55 2007 . Brian Sullivan wrote:
MESSAGE #12. Tue Sep 4 14:24:39 2007 . Katherine Krivjanik wrote:
MESSAGE #11. Tue Sep 4 13:00:26 2007 . Michael Preusser wrote:
MESSAGE #10. Mon Sep 3 17:26:59 2007 . Ian Mitchell wrote:
i found a pretty cool site Galaxy Zoo you get to classify pictures of galaxies from a sky survey. just thought i would share it with everyone
Ian
MESSAGE #9. Sun Sep 2 11:53:25 2007 . Jesus Careaga wrote:
MESSAGE #8. Sun Sep 2 0:31:00 2007 . Eran Bar Noy wrote:
Thanks, Eran
MESSAGE #7. Sat Sep 1 20:15:40 2007 . Prof. Doug Hamilton wrote:
Hannah's big empty spot in space is, I think, a region devoid of galaxies. We'll learn in ASTR121 that galaxies tend to group together in space, creating clusters and superclusters. Between these structures are vast empty spaces full of nothing!
And Kelly is trying to unify the four fundamental forces - gravity, electromagnetism, the weak force and the strong force. The latter three have been combined in successful theories, but gravity is proving difficult. Scientists working with large accelerators like CERN seek clues in ever more energetic collisions between particles traveling at near light speeds.
And finally, if you want to post links here, use the "View Source" button on your browser to see how its done. You can type HTML code directly into your messages.
MESSAGE #6. Fri Aug 31 22:13:07 2007 . Lauren Woolsey wrote:
That solar system visualizer you posted, Professor Hamilton, is so cool! You should make Pluto a "minor body" now, haha.
Also, if anyone is vaguely opposed to spending money on the Starry Night software (I have it at home, it /is/ really nice) but still wants that sort of program on their computer, there's a free alternative that has a lot to offer: Stellarium. You can load it on linux, Windows, or even Mac OS. You should definitely check it out. http://www.stellarium.org/
MESSAGE #5. Fri Aug 31 17:29:50 2007 . Prof. Doug Hamilton wrote:
MESSAGE #4. Fri Aug 31 13:38:45 2007 . Hannah Gerlach wrote:
Cheers, Hannah
MESSAGE #3. Fri Aug 31 11:59:20 2007 . Kelly Colwell wrote:
I was just wondering about your opinion of string theory vs. brane theory... I mean, they are based on completely different concepts, one is model-building while the other employs a theory that seems to fit, but isn't based on solid facts. Do you think that the experiment at CERN to find the kalutza-klein particles will change this?
Thanks :)
Kelly
MESSAGE #2. Thu Aug 30 15:19:16 2007 . Jason Schwankert wrote:
MESSAGE #1. Mon Aug 13 18:25:19 2007 . Prof. Doug Hamilton wrote:
* Offer void where prohibited by law, you must be enrolled in ASTR120 to participate, and bonus points have no cash value.